We’ve all experienced it: 3 seconds into a track you’ve never heard, you know instinctively that it was recorded and mixed in someone’s bedroom.
Amateur recordings often sound “amateur.” But what differentiates these hometracked opuses from professional recordings? It’s not just fidelity or sonic quality: Many competent engineers produce lo-fi or distorted mixes on purpose, when it suits the song. Rather, amateur recordings tend to share some key traits, telltale signs that the mixing and recording are the work of a novice.
You can learn to recognize and address these traits in your own recordings, and produce more polished, professional mixes:
- Too much bass: Nothing says amateur mix like a boomy, overpowering bottom-end. Novice engineers often monitor and mix through headphones or small speakers which under-represent low frequencies. It’s natural to compensate by boosting the bass instruments, but this in turn yields muddy, indistinct mixes. If you find your mixes sound boomy on other systems, try checking everything you do against a commercial reference CD to better gauge the appropriate bass levels.
Poor drum levels: For great drum tracks, everything in the recording chain matters: The room, the drums, the microphones (and of course the drummer.) So before recording a band, professional engineers spend days or weeks tweaking each element in the chain for the best drum sound, and to ensure that no single drum overpowers or vanishes in the mix. In fact, drums are arguably the hardest instrument to record. A large kit can require 10 or more microphones, so it’s little wonder the drums in amateur recordings often come up short.
But even if we don’t have a $50,000 mic collection to capture big studio sound, we amateurs can still at least get good levels. If you have difficulty getting your drums mixed right, try this: Listen to a modern recording that’s sonically similar to the track you’re mixing, and slowly lower the volume. Notice, as the level approaches 0, which elements of the mix are the last to disappear. In contemporary music, it’s usually the kick drum, snare drum, and lead vocal. Now, try to replicate this in your own mixes.
Clashing instruments: This is an issue with arrangement as much as production. A song’s parts can lack distinction because the individual instruments don’t have their own space within the song’s arrangement. It’s a tell-tale sign of an amateur mix because many of us write as we record, progressively adding new layers to a song, rather than arranging ahead of time and recording only what’s needed. There’s nothing wrong with this approach, per se, but it clearly separates the amateurs from the pros: A professional producer refines the arrangement before setting foot in the studio.
If you find your instrumentation lacks distinction, consider revising the arrangement to add some space. Let your tracks breathe.
Uneven vocals: The biggest difference between superstar singers and us wannabes isn’t pitch or tone or vibrato. (Let’s face it: Some of the best selling artists are terrible singers, at least in the classical sense.) Rather, what separates good from great, most often, is dynamics. A great singer knows how to control the volume of her voice, and more importantly, when to change her volume. And this has as much to do with the singer’s skill in front of a microphone as it does with her voice. When we hear uneven vocals, we hear a bad bar band with the singer mumbling 2 feet back from the microphone, or half-swallowing the mic and screaming. In other words, an amateur.
Recording vocals more evenly isn’t hard. First and foremost, the singer must practice! Before you hit record, ensure the singer knows every change in the song, and even when it’s best to inhale throughout the song for optimum breath control.
And take note of this simple reminder: near … far … near … far
- Overused reverb: When used to add ambience or depth, reverb is best applied sparingly. Beginners often miss this, opting for the “some is good, more is better” approach (which is understandable: Remember how lush and important your voice sounded the first time you heard it through a “Carnegie Hall” reverb preset?) But in modern commercial recordings, reverb, unless it’s used as an obvious effect, is usually inaudible, adding texture to the sound without actually being perceptible. Best advice: Raise the reverb level until it’s just present, then back off a notch. And resist the urge to soak your vocals in deep chamber and hall reverb effects.
- Cheap reverb: Even an untrained ear can hear the difference between a $3000 Lexicon unit and the free reverb built into your multitrack recorder. Cheap reverbs sound, basically, cheap. Especially on lead vocals. If you don’t have access to a decent plugin (though SIR, considered one of the best, is free,) consider avoiding reverb altogether. Or at least, per the point above, avoid obvious reverb.
“Fake” drums: More specifically, obviously programmed drums attempting to pass as live drums. This isn’t an issue in electronic and dance music, where listeners expect to hear steady quantized beats from drum machines. But pop and rock music have dynamic rhythm requirements, and listeners are conditioned to expect a more natural, nuanced sound from the drum track.
The ride cymbal and snare drum are the most obvious amateur giveaways. A snare drum’s tone depends on where, and how hard, the stick hits the head, and this goes double for the ride cymbal, especially near the bell. So when a drum track features 32 bars of 8th notes using the same ride cymbal sample at the same volume, listeners always sense something’s not right.
If you don’t have access to a drummer and drum kit, you can still create believable programmed drum tracks with a little effort. This article from Sound On Sound has some great tips on humanizing for more realistic drum beats.
Muddy, indistinct vocals: If a song has lyrics, listeners should be able to hear those lyrics. That might sound obvious, but it’s an important point lost on many novice recordists. Several things contribute to indistinct vocals:
The proximity effect on a directional microphone. Most vocal mics boost the low frequencies of close-miked sound sources, so back off the mic a few inches for a clearer sound.
Singing without a pop filter. Plosives produce a blast of air that sounds careless and lazy. If you don’t have a pop screen, you can easily make your own.
Poor or inappropriate EQ. Novices often attempt to clean up a vocal track by boosting high frequencies, hoping to add definition. However, this usually has the opposite effect, increasing sibilance and giving the vocal a sharp, edgy sound without improving the clarity. It’s far more effective to clean a track with a low-frequency cut, and you can safely remove everything below 100Hz from vocals. In fact, your microphone might even feature a low-frequency roll off switch for this purpose.
Your mix sells the vocal performance. So make sure the lyrics can be heard.
- Too much bad room sound: Unless you have a well-treated space, or record in a very large room, your room probably doesn’t flatter your recordings. (See The Portable Vocal Booth for details.) However, a bad room doesn’t automatically equal bad recordings. Many classic albums were recorded in less-than-perfect environments by engineers wise enough to limit the room’s presence on the recording.
Strive to minimize the room sound in your recordings by close-miking whenever possible, and choosing microphones with polar patterns that reduce the capture of extra room noise.
Timing problems: Professional musicians practice a song for weeks or months before recording it. But as noted above, many amateurs write while they record, essentially eliminating practice from the process. Additionally, whether through impatience or inexperience, beginners tend to approach recording with a “fix it in the mix” mentality, which naturally leads to sloppy takes. You don’t need to aim for perfection to sound like a pro. But you do need your “keeper” takes to be free of obvious timing errors. A single snare drum hit lagging by a 16th of a beat is enough to make your whole track sound amateur.
Worded another way: Good bands are tight, so when you don’t sound tight people assume you’re not good. Spend some more time practicing your new song before hitting record, and you’ll capture better performances. And sound more professional as a result.
14 Responses to “10 Signs Your Track is Amateur”
Loopy - the diary - 10 signs your track is amateur says:
December 11th, 2007 at 4:02 am
[…] 10 signs your track is amateur. […]
Clive Paterson says:
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:51 pm
Yep, I think I’ve done all of these. I wonder if thats a good thing.
February 5th, 2008 at 9:08 am
This was one of the best articles I have seen lately on this topic. I give it a big thumb up and I will come back on your blog for more! Good work!
FIRAT YÄ°ÄžÄ°TASLAN says:
February 19th, 2008 at 7:41 am
first sorry fo my poor english. Ä± think beginning and being an amateur is completely differ. thanx to you that Ä± have noticed that Ä± am an amateur. Ä± did no get all of these 10 signs but could really get an other 10 bad signs from the faces of my friends… by the way do you think using FL STUDIO will be enough to write a semi professional song.??
February 19th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
FL Studio is actually quite capable of making good music. When I was using it, I avoided using the default fruity instruments or samples. I always loaded in my own VST instruments and audio samples to ensure quality.
FIRAT YÄ°ÄžÄ°TASLAN says:
March 21st, 2008 at 5:45 pm
how can Ä± send you a sample of mine which you can critisise on?
April 1st, 2008 at 10:58 am
great post. i’ve wonder why my tracks lack that professional sound (i’ve only been producing for like 6 months). some great tips!
Mark Thomas says:
May 10th, 2008 at 7:13 am
very practical post! and i think one of the most concise articles i found on this site!! thumbs up to you!!
Uday Verma says:
May 27th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
This is a good and an informative read. I feel I need to revisit my latest track and fix the traits discussed here. At least 5 of the things here, I suspect, are present in my tracks :).
June 9th, 2008 at 7:16 am
recon you coudl do one on electronic/dance music alone?
Christopher John says:
July 27th, 2008 at 7:11 am
I use Sonar Producer 4 edition, a Korg pa-80 sequencer for my sound bank and a couple of Sony speakers, all pumped through my trusty HP compaq nx9040 notebook.
I can say Sonar is a great tool for amateurs. You can actually master the project all by yourself, if you have impeccable hearing and high musical IQ.
August 21st, 2008 at 9:48 am
as “admin” said, Fl studio is as powerful as any other DAW, but the built in instruments and samples arent worth using it AT ALL. and most of the fx plug-ins, but there are some that can be used.
Blood overdrive, which is a great distortion and act as a compressor by the same time, but be aware that this plug-in as a really recognizable sound, characteristic to FL.
Parametric EQ & EQ 2, are nice all-around eqs and are easy to work with, but they arent good enough for mastering purpose.
Delay Bank, alto it is not of “great” quality, it has some feature other delays doesnt, like “grain-spacing delay” which can create a nice effect when used properly, but not as all-around delay.
But id recommend getting the “waves” plug-ins bundles, more bang for the buck!
September 7th, 2008 at 8:53 am
There’s so much that goes into a great recording! The quality of the sounds, the amount they overlap, the quality of effects, the balance of instruments, the caliber of singer.
One of my favorite techniques is when I’m done with a project to pick one of two instruments or times in the song when the instrument do NOT play. This is hard, because you get attached to your baby and don’t want to eliminate/reduce the amount of music in your song. But the funny thing is that white space is greatly appreciated, and can make a sound even better in a mix. So to add onto the clashing instruments point, you can have TOO many instruments as well!
How to Get Six Pack Fast says:
April 15th, 2009 at 7:49 am
This is very up-to-date info. I think I’ll share it on Delicious.